Public Policing Versus Private Security

state-supported Policing Versus cliquish certificate Kayla Cook CJA/500 November 8, 2009 Mrs. Jancie Graham gyp human race policing and mystical hostage harbor several(prenominal) distinct differences. humans policing is the index to enforce the impartiality and view as edict in society. Private securities argon give agencies that per wee-wee the protecting(prenominal) and loss- encumberion duties non handled by police officers. Yet man policing and hole-and-corner(a) aegis offers the alike(p) maneuver and duties. These emoluments and duties be performed to succeed some of the akin goals. Both serve as becomeing in their line of work.The leadership requirements atomic number 18 regulate by two incompatible standards. They twain sh ar a overconfident affinity with the shepherds crook jurist organisation. This kindred could be enhanced if the two would union with one an early(a). This could benefactor them combine their internal policies for the current role they perform now. common policing and orphic credential system will reach out to grow and work together in the future. This paper will besides sop up and discuss the importance of a large security visualise, and its key components. The Differences between populace Policing and Private protectionPublic policing is the efficiency to enforce the law and maintain order in society. Private securities ar paid agencies that perform the protective and loss- keep backion duties not handled by police officers. Public policing and private security exhaust several distinct differences. Public policing does the quest 1) maintain order, 2) performs biotic community service, 3) detect disgust, 4) handle discourtesy, and 5) prevent crime, 6) traffic control, 7) stop and question an individual, 8) hunt club individuals and their personal belongings, 9) conduct interrogations, and 10) arrest an individual.Private security does the following paid duties 1) serves as an escort, 2) guard housing and business areas, 3) serves as guards at gates, 4) transport valuables, 5) security training, 6) screening of staff office for employment, 7) technical counter surveillance, 8) security consultation, 9) set up alarm systems and 10)offer private security vaults (Reid, 1996). The Similarities between Public Policing and Private security measures Public policing and private security offers some of the same services and duties. These services and duties are performed to achieve some of the same goals.In this way they are able to look each other in performing these services and duties. Public policing and private security offer the following services and duties 1) crime prevention, 2) crime control, 3) assist is emergencies, 4) training, 5) conduct searches, 6) involved in community events, 7) offer security, 8) monitor specific area, 9) contributes protection, and 10) they both surrender legal powers. Both ordinary policing and private security agencie s are held responsible for their actions. Neither escapes criticisms from outside sources.Our society inevitably the services and duties that both provide to help ensure the safety of our freedom and our dimension (Walker, & Katz, 2011). The Differences between Public Policing and Private warranter Leadership Roles The difference between reality policing and private security leadership roles are the standard requirements for leadership. The requirement for leadership in public policing is regulated by the administration and courtly service. The entirely requirement for leadership in private security is to lead by example. This is because private security agencies are privately have and they do not have a set postulate standard.The Relationship of Public Policing and Private credentials with the Criminal umpire System The relationship of public policing with the wrong arbiter system is to prevent crime and provide nicety to the public. The relationship of private securi ty with the criminal justice system is to prevent crime and provide justice to its employees. They both serving the same relationship with the criminal justice system. The relationship would be work more(prenominal)(prenominal) effective if law enforcement officers and private security agencies would work together along with the criminal justice system to prevent crime and provide justice to the public and private employees.The Essential Policies for Public Policing and Private Security Public policing and private security have several distinct differences in their inborn policies. The essential policies for public policing are 1) Hierarchical- in that location are many different semiofficial and formal levels of public agencies positions. 2) Civil service- civil service examinations are given to chose only the most qualified personnel base on merit. 3) Apolitical- the political relation gives the policies to public policing to execute. 4) cold-eyed and handsome- the treat ment of solely citizen using government services are to be fair and just. ) Public affairs-oriented- focus is given to the care of public agencies and validations. 6) Public-service oriented- profit is not a motive the serve the public. 7) Publicly funded- valuate revenues fund these public administrations. 8) Publicly documented- all told citizens can review administrative records and financial documents. 9) Accountable to the public- at anytime legislative and juridical review can be through with(p) to public administration. The essential policies for private security are 1) Private enterprise- goal is to finish a private obligation sort of of a public one. ) Private or corporate ownership- private brass instruments are owned by private individuals, groups, or stockholders. 3) Competitiveness- the organization may be in contender with another organization with the same crossing or service. 4) Profit fillip- normally the incentive is to generate net profit unless it i s a nonprofit private organization. 5) Financing regulated by market price- the ability to swop the product or service is found on revenue. 6) Privacy of information and records- exceptional information is proprietary and the property of the owners. ) office to owners and stockholders- instead of being accountable to the public, the organization and its employees are held accountable to the organizations owners. 8) Some freedom in survival and termination of employees- civil service rules do not regulate the organization ability to hire or terminate employees. 9) immunity to regulate work methods and organization- the organization is not regulated by civil service rules (Ortmeier, 2009). The importance of a Comprehensive Security Plan and Its Key Components The security plan essential also sterilise the persons who have access to security areas, and it mustiness specify the various components necessary for physical security, such as barriers, lighting, alarm systems, fire protection systems, locks, and communications. It must detail full instructions for the guard force. These instructions must harbour both general orders applicable to all guards and special orders pertaining to specific posts, patrols, and areas. There must be provision for emergency situations. specific plans for fire, flood, storm, or power failure should be part of the overall plan of action.You should also specify people to call in an emergency. After the security plan has been conjecture and implemented, it must be reexamined periodically for flaws and for ways to improve it and keep it current with subsisting needs. Circulation of the plan should be limited and controlled. It must be remembered that such a plan, until now well conceived, is doomed from the outset unless it is always and carefully supervised (Fisher, Halibozek, & Green, 2008, 36 culmination Public policing and private security are major components in the criminal justice system.The mere existence of bo th public policing and private security helps our communities feel safe. one time the two merge and work together, more problems can be solved to prevent crimes. This alliance will be form when the importance of each others responsibilities and roles are identified. Law enforcement agencies are easy coming to realize the benefits of a partnership with private security can be since 9/11. This was just one of the many examples of how effectively public policing and private security can work together.In the future, public policing and private security will continue to work together to prevent crime and provide justice to all. References Fisher, R. J. , Halibozek, E. , & Green, G. (2008). approach to Security (8th ed. ). Burlington, MA Butterworth-Heinemann. Katz, C. M. & Walker, S. (2011). The Police in America An Introduction (7th ed. ). New York, NY McGraw-Hill Ortmeier, P. J. (2008). Introduction to Security trading operations and Management (3rd ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ Pe arson/Prentice Hall. Reid, Sue (1996). Criminal Justice (4th ed. ). Madison, WI. Brown & Benchmark.